This week we have
looked at another scholarly way of grouping deities, we built upon the Olympian
twelve grouping and added the Chthonian group. The concept of Olympian and Chthonian
deities was the concept of Georg Friedrich Creuzer (1771-1851) and Karl Otfried
Muller (1797- 1840). Muller described the contrast between the Olympian deities
and the Chthonian deities.
The
Chthonian group is the group of deities living in and relating to the
underworld or the dark side of the world. Some of the Chthonian Gods were Hades,
Hecate, Persephone and more. The image depicts Hades and Hecate these deities
were both in the Chthonian group as they were both linked to the underworld.
Hades ruled the underworld and the underworld was also called Hades.
The
Chthonian Gods were ruled by Hades and the Olympian Gods were ruled by Zeus in
Olympus. The Chthonian Gods were seen to be the complete opposite of the
Olympian ones. The Olympian gods were male dominant, patriarchal and rich
whereas the Chthonian Gods were indigenous dominant, matriarchal and
poor/localised Gods. The Olympian Gods were seen as the strong men rulers and
the Chthonian Gods were seen as the weak female rulers. Also Muller describes
the Chthonian Gods as Murky Gods that embraced all areas of life and death.
Muller describes the Olympian Gods as simple and ‘of the bright upper world’. This shows there was a binary to Ancient Greek
religion Parker states that the issue is the shape of the divine world as seen
by the Greeks. I take this to mean that the Ancient Greeks tried to group their
Gods and show that nobody was as good or superior to the Olympian twelve they
had to make the Chthonian Gods the opposite as they were to do with the
underworld they had to be inferior to the Olympian Gods which caused conflict
between the two groups as some of the Chthonian Gods such as Hades resented
being the ‘inferior’ group.
Is
the idea of Olympian and Chthonian deities a scholarly fantasy? Scholars such
as Muller and Creuzer came up with this idea of grouping deities but they could
not always stick to it. This would suggest that this way of grouping Gods was
only a scholarly fantasy as they could not even stick to the grouping methods
themselves so how can everyone else? There are always challenges when
things/people are put into groups as some people may not agree about the grouping
so there will always be arguments regarding this between scholars. I think it
id difficult when looking at these two groups as yes most of the Gods fit ‘perfectly’
in the ideals of the groups but there are Gods like Persephone that would be in
one group for one half of the year and the another group for the other half of
the year, as Persephone only lived in the underworld (Hades) for six months at
a time.
Bibliography
Book
R. Parker. (2011) On Greek Religion, Cornell University
Press.
Website
Journals
Schlesier,
R.1991.2. “Olympian versus Chthonian religion.” Scripta Classica Israelica
11: 38-51
Image
No comments:
Post a Comment